“Just Give the Goal” – Erling Haaland Breaks Ranks to Defend Dominik Szoboszlai 😤⚽
Dominik Szoboszlai’s red card — a moment that completely flipped the game — has continued to divide fans, pundits, and former players. While many accepted the decision as “by the book,” others saw it as another example of football punishing intent rather than common sense.
And now, one of the Premier League’s most feared strikers has stepped into the debate.
“That’s Too Harsh” – From an Unexpected Voice 👀
Haaland, speaking after the game, made it clear he felt for the Liverpool midfielder. In his view, the incident should never have escalated to a sending-off — let alone a three-match suspension.
The City forward’s argument was simple:
👉 If the goal stands, why ruin the match with a red card?
For Haaland, the punishment didn’t fit the moment. The game had flow, intensity, and drama — until one decision overshadowed everything else.
Szoboszlai Pays the Price 💔
For Szoboszlai, the fallout is brutal. Missing three games could seriously disrupt Liverpool’s momentum at a crucial stage of the season. Beyond that, the frustration is mental — a player judged not just on outcome, but on interpretation.
Liverpool fans are furious. Neutrals are confused. And when even an opposition star questions the call, it raises an uncomfortable question:
Was justice really served?
A Bigger VAR Problem? 🤔
This incident has reopened an old wound in English football — consistency. Players, fans, and managers keep asking for the same thing:
- Protect the game
- Protect the players
- And stop letting decisions steal the spotlight
Instead of celebrating a top-level contest, everyone is talking about cards, bans, and officials once again.
Final Thought 🗣️
When rivals start defending each other, you know something isn’t right.
Szoboszlai’s red card may stand on paper — but in the court of football opinion, the debate is far from over.
What do you think?
Was the red card justified… or did football overreact once again? 👇🔥
