A fresh twist has emerged in the ongoing transfer saga involving Newcastle’s star striker and Liverpool. The forward, who is under contract at St. James’ Park until 2028, recently issued a fiery Instagram statement accusing the club of breaking promises and insisting that “the relationship cannot continue.”
Liverpool had already seen a £110 million offer rejected earlier this summer, with Newcastle reportedly holding out for closer to £150 million. Tensions escalated further when the striker refused to feature in the Magpies’ recent goalless draw against Aston Villa, instead training separately from the main squad.
This stand-off has raised a key question: could he use FIFA regulations to walk away from his contract and secure a transfer to Anfield?
According to sports law experts, the answer isn’t straightforward. FIFA’s Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (Articles 14–17) allow unilateral contract termination only in cases of “just cause,” such as unpaid wages or a serious breach of contract. Simply being unhappy or wanting a transfer does not qualify.
If the striker were to tear up his deal without just cause, Newcastle could demand heavy compensation covering lost wages, replacement costs, and even market value—potentially a figure well beyond nine figures. Legal costs could add further weight to the punishment.
On the other side, Newcastle still has disciplinary tools available, including fines and suspensions, though clubs are usually reluctant to use such measures on high-value players. The reality is a delicate balance: while the Magpies hold the legal power, keeping an unsettled player risks destabilising the squad.
With the saga now blending football, law, and high-stakes money, all eyes are on whether this clash ends in reconciliation, punishment—or a record-breaking exit.
Leave a Reply