Liverpool’s summer transfer business has been nothing short of dramatic — over £300m spent, more than £200m recouped in sales, and a squad reshaped for the new season. But despite the flurry of arrivals and departures, one burning question still lingers: who replaces Luis Díaz after his shock move to Bayern Munich?

For weeks, fans have been expecting a big-name winger to arrive at Anfield. Yet, manager Arne Slot has suggested the answer might not come from outside at all — but from within the squad.

Speaking to The Times, Slot revealed his confidence in the attacking depth already at his disposal:

> “If you see Florian Wirtz as an attacking option as well, you can make it five [forwards available],” the Dutchman explained. “Yes, Darwin [Núñez] has left, Hugo [Ekitike] has arrived, Luis [Díaz] is gone, but maybe Florian can be seen as his replacement. Then there’s Jeremie Frimpong who, when fit, is also capable of playing wide. That gives us six players for three positions.”



This statement strongly suggests that Slot is not in a rush to splash more cash on another winger before the transfer deadline. While Alexander Isak remains a major target, Liverpool’s boss appears comfortable relying on Wirtz, Ekitike, and even Frimpong to provide attacking cover.

Is Liverpool’s Squad Really Deep Enough? 🤔

Despite the optimism, concerns remain. Competing for the Premier League, Champions League, and domestic cups means some players could be stretched to 50+ appearances this season. That kind of workload could expose any weaknesses in squad depth.

Many supporters still feel another winger, a striker, and a centre-back are essential before the window shuts. Without those reinforcements, there’s a risk the Reds could struggle to sustain a title charge.

The Bigger Picture

Slot’s message is clear — he trusts his current crop of players and wants fans to do the same. But with only a week left in the transfer window, eyes will remain glued on whether Liverpool finally push through more deals or stick with the talent already in-house.

One thing is certain: the Luis Díaz question has not gone away — it’s just been reframed.